Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 13:22

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Abby Lee Miller Sues Cedars-Sinai Hospital, Claims Doctors Left Catheter in Her Body - TMZ
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why do females hate MGTOW so much?
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Hackers take aim at Washington Post journalists in an apparent ‘targeted’ cyberattack - CNN
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
BYU could make noise at NCAA championship 'if big guns show up' - Deseret News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
A former police chief who escaped from an Arkansas prison is captured - NPR
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Samsung may soon open One UI 8 beta program for Galaxy S22 - SamMobile
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?